Raco v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the -4- J-S13036-18 “[s]afety, permanency, and well-being of the child must take precedence over all other considerations.”
• stating that “[s]afety, permanency, and well-being of the child must take precedence over all other considerations.” (citation omitted; emphasis in original)
• stating that “[s]afety, permanency, and well-being of the child must take precedence over all other considerations.” (citation omitted; emphasis in original)
• stating that in a change of goal proceeding, “[t]he trial court must focus on the child and determine the goal with reference to the child’s best interests, not those of the parents.”
• giving priority to child’s safety and stability, despite parent’s substantial compliance with permanency plan
• giving priority to child's safety and stability, despite parent's substantial compliance with permanency plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).