Racinowski v. Pate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial of DUA benefits based on application of regulation defining “unemployed worker,” 20 C.F.R. 625.2(s), was discretionary action not subject to judicial review
• interpreting precursor to the Stafford Act, the Disaster Relief Act of 1974
• “[T]he legislative history of the statute reveals that Congress was concerned not only about the possible costs of paying damages, but also the certain costs of defending suits arising from government relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).