Racich v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that public policy reasons for sovereign immunity as expressed in Currie apply to limit scope of section 8-101
• whether defendant would be entitled to invoke a sovereign immunity defense is a separate question
• whether defendant would be entitled to invoke a sovereign immunity defense is a separate question
• whether defendant would be entitled to invoke a sovereign immunity defense is a separate question
• “[plaintiffs] claims cannot be saved by virtue of having also been brought against the officers ‘individually’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. Willoughby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-15· cited 23×
• Courson v. Danville School District No. 118
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-14· cited 11×
• Salzer v. Barff
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-12-15· cited 4×
• Snyder v. Village of Midlothian
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-08-07· cited 3×
• Courson v. Danville School Dist.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Currie v. Lao
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-19· cited 245×
• Bartholomew v. Crockett
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-03-06· cited 49×
• Toys\ R\ US, Inc. v. Adelman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-28· cited 36×
• Gocheff v. State Community College
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-02-23· cited 27×
• Miller v. Schultz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-24· cited 5×
• Fosco v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-05-13· cited 4×