Rachel Leal-Hudson v. Julie Ketterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a warrantless arrest does not violate the Fourth Amendment if, at the time of the defendant's arrest, police had probable cause to believe that an offense has been, is being, or will be committed
• Stating it was “clearly 18 established long ago that an officer may not conduct a warrantless arrest absent probable 19 cause.”
• stating the probable cause standard as whether the facts and circumstances were sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing the arrestee had committed an offense
• evidence taken from defendant at police station following arrest without probable cause should have been excluded at state trial
• the probable cause analysis for a warrantless 6 arrest involves “the facts known to the officer at the time of the arrest”
• “[S]afeguards [are] provided by an objective predetermination of probable cause . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).