Rachel Ehrenfeld v. Khalid Salim Bin Mahfouz, Docket No. 06-2228-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it would be “legal error” for district court to “forbid[ ] jurisdictional discovery any time a plaintiff does not make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction”
• stating that it would be “legal error” for district court to “forbid[ ] jurisdictional discovery any time a plaintiff does not make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction”
• clarifying the ruling in Jazini v. Nissan Motor Co., 148 F.3d 181 (2d Cir. 1998
• “A District Court’s denial of jurisdictional discovery is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
• ʺ[E]ven if the New York Court of Appeals concludes that personal jurisdiction is proper under § 302(a)(1) of the New York long‐arm statute, this Court must make the ultimate determination whether this jurisdiction satisfies constitutional due process.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).