RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “moving an employee to an inferior office or eliminating the employee’s work station” does not constitute an adverse employment action in a retaliation claim (citation omitted)
• concluding that “none of the following constitutes an adverse employment action in a retaliation claim: . . . a personal improvement plan, . . . a verbal reprimand, ‘a formal letter of reprimand,’ or ‘a proposed termination.’”
• finding that a letter of reprimand does not constitute an adverse employment action in the context of a retaliation claim
• explaining that “the alleged disability must have existed at the time of the purported discrimination for the discrimination to have been due to the disability”
• stating that neither an “Attendance Watning” nor a “formal letter of reprimand” 18 constitute an adverse employment action in a retaliation claim
• explaining that considering an employee AWOL is not an adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).