Rabel v. Illinois Wesleyan University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the responsibility of a university \is to properly educate\ its students, not to act as their custodian
• university neither had a duty to protect student, who was injured as a result of a fraternity prank, in its capacity as landlord, nor had it voluntarily assumed or placed itself in a custodial relationship with its students
• university neither had a duty to protect student, who was injured as a result of a fraternity prank, in its capacity as landlord, nor had it voluntarily assumed or placed itself in a custodial relationship with its students
• university policies do not create duty towards students

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).