Rabassa v. Passmenet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in the context of actions brought by students, \aspirational statements ... do not provide a valid basis for a breach of contract claim\
• noting that plaintiff “may plead in the alternative . . . both categories [of Title IX liability],” but regardless of the category, “wholly conclusory allegations” are insufficient to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) challenge
• sufficient claim alleged when, in concert with the DCL, multiple news outlets criticized the colleges' handling of sexual assault claims
• “Internal administrative and academic determinations . . . are redressable, if at all, in an article 78 proceeding, not a plenary action.” (citation omitted)
• breach-of- contract claim failed where plaintiff cited mere “aspirational statements” that the colleges fashioned disciplinary policies “intended to reflect . . . federal and state laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).