· 9/20/1994
Rabang v. Immigration And Naturalization Service
Citations
- 35 F.3d 1449
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 13244
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7195
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that individuals born in the Philippines when it was a U.S. territory were not entitled to citizenship by birth because they were not born “in the United States” as contemplated by the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (alteration in original)
- Of course, here, Petitioner entered the United States legally, so Sotelo does not dispose of this case.
- Of course, here, Petitioner entered the United States legally, so So-telo does not dispose of this case.
- Fourteenth Amendment has an “express territorial limitation which prevents its extension to every place over which the government exercises its sovereignty.”
- “In the Insular Cases the Supreme Court decided that the territorial scope of the phrase ‘the United States’ as used in the Constitution is limited to the states of the Union.” (footnote omitted)
- “A complaint should not be dismissed unless it appears beyond doubt that plaintiff 13 can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.