Skip to main content
· 2/19/1980

Rabago v. California

Citations

  • 444 U.S. 1090
  • 100 S. Ct. 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • withholding discovery where minimal relevance outweighed by privacy & confidentiality interest
  • “The standards for nonparty discovery… require a stronger showing of 4 relevance than for simple party discovery.”
  • “The standards for 2 nonparty discovery… require a stronger showing of relevance than for simple party 3 discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.