Raanan Katz v. Irina Chevaldina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “use of the Photo was transformative because, in the context of the blog post’s surrounding commentary, [defendant] used [plaintiffs] purportedly ‘ugly’ and ‘compromising’ appearance to ridicule and satirize his character”
• finding that the use of the photograph was transformative because it was accompanied by commentary that ridiculed and satirized the subject of the photograph

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).