Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that state actions which are “too tenuous, remote, or peripheral” to warrant preemption would include “run-of-the-mill state-law claims such as unpaid rent, failure to pay creditors, or even torts committed by an ERISA plan” (citation omitted)
• stating that state actions which are “too tenuous, remote, or peripheral” to warrant preemption would include “run-of-the-mill state-law claims such as unpaid rent, failure to pay creditors, or even torts committed by an ERISA plan” (citation omitted)
• provisionally holding ERISA did not preempt state law claims where the dispute did not directly involve the ERISA plan but rather two of its subcontractors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).