R. R. D. v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that statute “does not require that all members of” the pro‐ tected group “suffer the same fate”
• reasoning that statute “does not require that all members of” the pro‐ tected group “suffer the same fate”
• explaining that alien advanced a viable particular social group because “[b]eing a former agent is an immutable characteristic; nothing R.R.D. can do will erase his employment history”
• accepting the applicant’s testimony that his persecutors were still looking for him and threatening him
• accepting the applicant’s testimony that his persecutors were still looking for him and threatening him
• asylum statute \does not require that all members of that category suffer the same fate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).