R. P. Hill and Mary Hill v. A. E. Waxberg, Doing Business as Waxberg Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the general contract theory of com- pensatory damages should be applied” in an action for breach of an implied-in-fact contract
• recovery upon finding of contract implied in law is “limited to the value of the benefit which was acquired”
• \ [Restitution is properly limited to the value of the benefit which was acquired.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).