Skip to main content
· 4/29/1895

R. M. Kinsloe & Son v. Davis

Citations

  • 167 Pa. 519
  • 31 A. 934
  • 1895 Pa. LEXIS 942

Syllabus

<p>Beneficial associations — Attachment execution.</p> <p>An attachment execution will not lie against a railroad company as custodian of an employees’ relief fund, on a judgment against a beneficiary named in the certificate of a deceased member of the relief association, where it appears that, by the rules of the association, the beneficiary is only entitled to the payment of the benefits upon the execution of a release to the railroad company, and such release has not in fact been executed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The doctrine of contributory negligence continues to be applicable to situations where both parties are negligent but the resulting injury is not covered under the Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Stebjrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.