R & L Ltd. Investments, Inc. v. Cabot Investment Properties, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining 15 Arizona law does not support the assertion that a finding of adhesion equates to a finding 16 of procedural unconscionability
• finding 14 arbitration clause substantively unconscionable where “Defendants have broad-ranging 15 remedies for claims they may have (arbitration plus), while Plaintiff has the sole remedy 16 of arbitration”
• “it does not appear .that there is any Arizona law supporting the assertion that a finding of adhesion equates to a finding of procedural unconscionability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).