R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment seeking enforcement of contracts that the defendants argued were unconscionable because the defendants did not sufficiently prove unconscionability
• holding that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment seeking enforcement of contracts that the defendants argued were unconscionable because the defendants did not sufficiently prove unconscionability
• basic test of 7 unconscionability considers whether “clauses involved are so one-sided as to be unconscionable under the circumstances existing at the time of the making of the contract”
• ordering specific performance for sale of unique goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).