R. K. Laros Co. v. Benger Laboratories Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court abused its discretion in part because it ignored a suggestion for a continuance
• holding preclusion is too drastic a remedy where a party identified a witness but failed to subsequently supplement the disclosure with additional information
• analyzing Fed. R. Evid. 403 factors based on reference to previous lawsuits to impeach credibility
• excluding evidence of prior lawsuits but noting a distinction “where a party has filed a series of fraudulent lawsuits and there is substantial evidence that the prior lawsuits amounted to a fraudulent pattern”
• excluding evidence of prior lawsuits but noting a distinction “where a party has filed a series of fraudulent lawsuits and there is substantial evidence that the prior lawsuits amounted to a fraudulent pattern”
• identifying relevant factors to consider on motion to strike untimely expert report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).