R. Glen FENSTERMACHER, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK and Carson Investment Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff waived his right to a jury trial by “solicit[ing] . . . a final adjudication” in injunctive proceedings
• stating that \no error can be predicated on insufficiency of notice since its purpose had been served.\
• noting that party’s failure to object to district court’s consolidation of the merits with a preliminary injunction hearing constituted a waiver of any defects stemming from the consolidation because the party had “acquiesced in the procedure followed in the district court”
• affirming district court’s refusal to admit deposition testimony of a party where counsel’s argument in support was only “to prove my case,” and the district court found this insufficient to establish relevance
• where plaintiff sought final equitable relief and acquiesced in consolidated hearing on preliminary injunction and the merits, he effectively waived jury trial though time for demand had not passed
• \[N]o error can be predicated on insufficiency of notice since its purpose had been served.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).