Skip to main content
· 10/26/1932

R. G. Bent Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 26 B.T.A. 1369
  • 1932 BTA LEXIS 1159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking first to the language of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, chapter 7.24 RCW, to determine whether a party had standing
  • standing requires an interest within the zone of interests being regulated and that the challenged action caused an \`injury in fact.'\
  • “Washington’s addition of the reference to corporations demonstrates that our framers were concerned with undue political influence exercised by those with large concentrations of wealth ....”
  • “right” to petition for annexation, which is not a privilege, does not invoke the right to vote or the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.