R. E. Morris Investments, Inc. v. Lind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking party’s demand for jury trial was inappropriate discovery sanction under rule 134(b)(2)
• Iowa Rule 134(b)(2) mirrors federal rule 37, and cases under rule 37 are persuasive authority
• “[W[e note that the federal courts have recognized constitutional limitations on the imposition of sanctions pursuant to [rule] 37 . . . and decisions in the federal courts interpreting that rule are of persuasive authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).