· 4/6/1984
R. & E. BUILDERS, INC. v. Chandler
Citations
- 476 A.2d 540
- 144 Vt. 302
- 1984 Vt. LEXIS 455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing “common law legal fiction that a husband and wife are one person for most legal purposes[]”
- rejecting common law rule that wife’s legal existence merged with that of her husband
- a wife cannot be held liable on a contract between her husband and a third party on the sole basis of the husband-wife relationship
- rejected common law rule that wife's legal existence merged with that of husband
- rejected common law rule that wife’s legal existence merged with that of husband
- modern statutes attempt to accord wives legal rights equal to husbands
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson, Keyser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.