Skip to main content
· 4/6/1984

R. & E. BUILDERS, INC. v. Chandler

Citations

  • 476 A.2d 540
  • 144 Vt. 302
  • 1984 Vt. LEXIS 455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing “common law legal fiction that a husband and wife are one person for most legal purposes[]”
  • rejecting common law rule that wife’s legal existence merged with that of her husband
  • a wife cannot be held liable on a contract between her husband and a third party on the sole basis of the husband-wife relationship
  • rejected common law rule that wife's legal existence merged with that of husband
  • rejected common law rule that wife’s legal existence merged with that of husband
  • modern statutes attempt to accord wives legal rights equal to husbands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson, Keyser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.