Skip to main content
· 11/30/1990

R. Dakin & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 752 F. Supp. 483
  • 14 Ct. Int'l Trade 797
  • 14 C.I.T. 797
  • 1990 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a puppet-like toy made up of a doll head and hands attached to a sleeve of bunting” is properly classified as “doll” under TSUS
  • noting that “the importer’s own consistent reference to the subject merchandise [by name] is a factor-albeit not the only one-to be considered for tariff classification purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tsoucalas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.