R Communications, Inc. v. Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court had jurisdiction to hear declaratory relief claim that contended section 112.108 of Tax Code was unconstitutional
• holding that, because trial court had jurisdiction to hear such claim for declaratory relief, claim should be remanded to that court to permit issue to be finally resolved
• holding tax code provision prohibiting declaratory actions and requiring taxpayers to seek relief through protest suit to be unconstitutional
• holding tax code provision prohibiting declaratory actions and requiring taxpayers to seek relief through protest suit to be unconstitutional
• holding tax code provision prohibiting declaratory actions and requiring taxpayers to seek relief through protest suit to be unconstitutional
• holding that conditioning a taxpayer’s right to initiate judicial review on the payment of taxes or the posting of a bond equal to twice the alleged tax obligation violates the open courts mandate of the Texas Bill of Rights. TEX. CONST. art. I, § 13.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).