R. A. Vachon & Son, Inc. v. City of Concord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• money spent for acquisition of property itself is properly excluded from consideration of whether property owner has obtained vested right by incurring liability or expense
• “[E]ven final approval of a subdivision plot by the planning board under authority of [the statute] does not place the lots beyond the authority of zoning changes.”
• published notice of terms “ comprehensive plan” held to be adequate.
• no vested rights in a zoning classification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).