R. A. Smiley and Mary H. Smiley v. State of South Dakota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• federal district court, pursuant to Rooker, had no jurisdiction to determine whether a trial court’s determination of plaintiffs riparian rights constituted a taking when the state supreme court, “fully cognizant of plaintiffs taking claim, affirmed the trial court’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).