Qwest Corp. v. City of Surprise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cities’ enactment of new ordinances after plaintiff filed action arguing that previous ordinances were preempted by federal law sufficient to render plaintiff’s claims moot
• “[A] government does not ordinarily benefit the general public when it acts in a proprietary capacity.”
• “When the first two Bidart factors are not dispositive, courts emphasize the third factor—the way in which the revenue is ultimately spent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).