Skip to main content
· 8/31/2000

Quist v. Specialties Supply Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 12 P.3d 863
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5089
  • 2000 Colo. App. LEXIS 1500
  • 2000 WL 1228802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the preclusive effect of a damages award received after arbitration on a later court proceeding involving the same parties
  • finding full and fair opportunity to litigate where “the arbitration award represents that it is based on the testimony of sworn witnesses and the arbitrator’s review of exhibits and briefs, as well as the arguments of counsel”
  • The double recovery prohibition “applies in cases involving multiple defendants as well as in cases involving multiple claims against a single defendant.”
  • “A plaintiff may not receive a double recovery for the same injuries or losses arising from the same conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Ruland, Casebolt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.