Quinzell Lawon Grasty v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

Petitioner, Quinzell Lawon Grasty, appeals the Hamilton County Criminal Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, he contends that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to challenge his first statement to police on the basis that he had requested counsel (2) failing to file a pretrial motion in limine to exclude references to gang activity (3) failing to object to the State‟s use of demonstrative evidence (4) failing to object to the chain of custody of a backpack (5) failing to request the trial court to question jurors about a newspaper found in the jury box and (6) failing to disclose that he had a conflict of interest with Petitioner's stepfather. Petitioner also argues that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to include a copy of the suppression hearing transcript in the record on appeal and failing to raise sufficiency of the evidence as an issue on appeal. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.