Quinton v. LT & L LOGGING, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under ORS 656.126(1), the employee was not a subject worker
• applying the permanent employment relation test and denying coverage after determining that the employee had permanently left the state
• “In determining whether claimant’s work outside the state is temporary, the correct standard is the permanent employment relation test.”
• no expectation that the employee would return to Oregon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).