Skip to main content
· 5/11/2010

Quinto v. United States Department of Justice

Citations

  • 711 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “communications to the [Bureau of Prisons] from the U.S. Attorney’s office regarding an inmate’s placement within the network of institutions under BOP control [ ] are clearly related to the enforcement of federal laws”
  • dismissing case where forum selection clause specified a county venue for the parties’ disputes, and no federal court was located in the county
  • rejecting the argument that a motion for reconsideration was appropriate because “the factual support for [the] argument was before the Court” the whole time
  • denying a motion for reconsideration where a party could have, but failed to, make the relevant arguments in its original summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.