Quintin Archie v. Valvtechnologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Supreme Court has squarely rejected the notion that ancillary [enforcement] jurisdiction can support removal under § 1441 absent an independent basis for original jurisdiction.” (citing Syngenta, 537 U.S. at 34)
• describing removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441
• describing removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).