Quintero v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court is not at liberty to reweigh evidence on appeal
• addressing conflicting testimony that controverted the plaintiffs claim as to the cause and extent of her injuries
• addressing conflicting testimony that controverted the plaintiffs claim as to the cause and extent of her injuries
• upholding jury verdict finding liability 23 but no damages because “a reasonable jury could have disbelieved Quintero's 24 testimony concerning her alleged pain and suffering and . . . inferred that she 25 was not injured as a proximate result of the accident”
• speculative responses to hypothetical offers to sell generally are not enough to support a determination of special value
• this court is not at liberty to weigh the evidence anew on appeal and will draw all favorable inferences towards the prevailing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).