Quintero v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a party has the right to revoke his consent at any time before the rendition of judgment”
• holding that a final judgment rendered on a motion to dismiss was improper where one party did not consent
• holding that when trial court has knowledge that party does not consent to judgment, trial court should refuse to sanction agreement by making it the judgment of the court
• holding that when trial court has knowledge that party does not 3 consent to judgment, trial court should refuse to sanction agreement by making it the judgment of the court
• holding that reversal of ―agreed‖ judgment on ground one party had withdrawn consent before rendition of judgment did not prejudice other party’s right to enforce agreement as contract and therefore remanding for further proceedings
• holding that power to render agreed judgment depends upon “the substance of the consent” at time judgment is rendered and that no such judgment ought to be rendered when trial court has knowledge that party does not consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).