Quintero v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because we agree with the district court that [plaintiff] cannot prevail on any of these grounds, we have no occasion to decide whether Woodford has bearing on them.”
• “Because we agree with the district court that [plaintiff] cannot prevail on any of these grounds, we have no occasion to decide whether Woodford has bearing on them.”
• “Because we agree with the district court that [plaintiff] cannot prevail on any of these grounds, we have no occasion to decide whether Woodford has bearing on them.”
• where “failure to appeal was not attributable to any threats or fear of retribution from prison staff,” grievance procedures were not “unavailable” under Hemphill v. New York, 380 F.3d 680, 688 (2d Cir. 2004)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Quintero v. Gonzales

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Quintero v. Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-11