Skip to main content
· 5/14/2001

Quintel Communications, Inc. v. Federal Transtel, Inc.

Citations

  • 142 F. Supp. 2d 476
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6514
  • 2001 WL 533224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a party's attempt to add clarifying language to a contract does not mean a contract lacking such clarifying language is necessarily different in scope: \[The] proposed language offered no more than belt and suspenders protection.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.