Quintana v. Knowles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the survey language, ‘“existing 30-foot access and utility easement ... [did] not make clear the width of either the road or the utility easement’” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. Partnership
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 58×
• Dethlefsen v. Weddle
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-06-22· cited 13×
• Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San Felipe
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-09-20· cited 4×
• Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San Felipe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-07-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weiland Ex Rel. Weiland v. Vigil
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-01-11· cited 22×
• Luchetti v. Bandler
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-06-06· cited 15×
• Herbertson v. Iliff
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-04-06· cited 12×
• Groff v. Circle K. Corporation
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-07· cited 10×
• Padilla v. City of Santa Fe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-03-22· cited 7×
• State Ex Rel. Baxter v. Egolf
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-02· cited 5×