Skip to main content

Quintana v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 276 S.W.3d 753
  • 2008 Ky. LEXIS 260
  • 2008 WL 4691054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that one's refusal to open his door and talk to police when they knock does not justify any further intrusion by the police
  • holding that when police are conducting a knock and talk, “[u]nless an officer has probable cause to obtain a warrant or exigent circumstances arise, the intrusion can go no further that the approach to the obvious public entrance of the house.”
  • stating that the procedure may be utilized “for the purpose of obtaining information about a crime that has been committed, a pending investigation, or matters of public welfare.”
  • “[T]he basic rule is that police with legitimate business may enter the areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open to use by the public.”
  • \[T]he basic rule is that police with legitimate business may enter the areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open to use by the public.\
  • \[T]he basic rule is that police with legitimate business may enter the areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open to use by the public.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.