Quintana v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party in interest’s failure to object to sale order resulted in consent given adequate notice and opportunity to object
• dismissing a losing bidder’s tortious interference claim against the defendant because the defendant bought the assets pursuant to a § 363 sale and received the assets “free and clear”
• motion to enforce confirmation order is core under § 157(b)(2)(L) & (N) because “[e]nforcement motions relating to such orders are . . . squarely within this court’s jurisdiction to hear and determine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).