Quinonez-Saa v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the instant case, the testimony adduced at trial was sufficient to show that the photographs were, like the written autopsy report, entered by a person with knowledge and kept as a normal course of business with the medical examiner’s office.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).