Quiñones Andino, Tatiana Isabel v. Rosario Reynoso, Jorge Angel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the court did not abuse its discretion in view of [the witness's] recalcitrance\
• holding that “the court did not abuse its discretion in view of [the witness’s] recalcitrance”
• holding that a witness’s conclusion that the defendant was involved in the charged conspiracy was admissible under Rule 701
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that evasive answers from recalcitrant and hesitant witness were inconsistent with his previously given statements
• permitting an alleged co-conspirator to testify that the defendant was “involved” in the charged conspiracy; that this testimony “went directly to the ultimate issue in the case . . . did not make [it] improper”
• “The district court should have considerable discretion to determine whether evasive answers are inconsistent with statements previously given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).