Skip to main content
· 3/11/1999

Quinney Electric, Inc. v. Kondos Entertainment, Inc.

Citations

  • 988 S.W.2d 212
  • 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 403
  • 1999 Tex. LEXIS 21
  • 1999 WL 125540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where all requirements of collateral estoppel are met, collateral es-toppel should preclude relitigation of factual issues
  • “[T]he basic function of collateral estoppel [is] to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that the party previously litigated and lost.”
  • “[T]he basic function of collateral estoppel [is] to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that the party previously litigated and lost.”
  • “[T]he basic function of collateral estoppel [is] to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that the party previously litigated and lost.”
  • discussion of \legislative history\ of Rule 299a in dissenting opinion
  • discussion of “legislative history” of Rule 299a in dissenting opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.