Quinn v. Parkoff Operating Corp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court does not “accept as true conclusory allegations, unwarranted factual inferences, or legal conclusions”
• requiring a plaintiff bringing an FLSA overtime-pay claim to plausibly allege, among other things, “that an employer- employee relationship existed during the time that [plaintiff] worked in excess of forty hours per week”
• finding allegation that plaintiff was “paid for her overtime at a rate less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which she was [] employed in violation of the FLSA” meets the standard for properly pleading an FLSA violation
• finding the allegation that plaintiff was “paid for her overtime at a rate less than one and one- half times the regular rate at which she was [ ] employed in violation of the FLSA” meets the standard for properly pleading an FLSA violation
• “[W]hether an employee is exempt under the FLSA is primarily a question of fact typically better suited for summary judgment.”
• “the regulations indicate that employees of private prisoner transportation companies are regulated by both the Department of Transportation and the Department of Justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).