Skip to main content
· 6/21/1976

Quinn v. Muscare

Citations

  • 425 U.S. 560
  • 96 S. Ct. 1752
  • 48 L. Ed. 2d 165
  • 1976 U.S. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a five day suspension implicated a property interest of a public employee who could only be suspended \for cause\ under the city charter
  • a five day suspension implicated a property interest of a public employee who could only be suspended “for cause” under the city charter
  • certiorari dismissed where, subsequent to grant of writ, developments in law make review unnecessary
  • finding property interest for Chicago firemen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.