Quinn v. City of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police department’s “requirement that an applicant possess a certain 21 level of hearing appears eminently reasonable” and directing judgment against plaintiff 22 who failed a “sound localization test”
• stating that the \public safety concerns involved with the day-to-day work of a patrol officer\ made a police department's hearing requirements \eminently reasonable\
• stating that the “public safety concerns involved with the day-today work of a patrol officer” made a police department’s hearing requirements “eminently reasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).