Skip to main content
· 2/11/1991

Quinn v. City of Columbia

Citations

  • 401 S.E.2d 165
  • 303 S.C. 405
  • 1991 S.C. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the contention that the matter was of such public importance as to confer standing
  • holding opponents to an annexation failed to establish standing in that they challenged only “the annexation method in seeking to have the annexation declared void and raise[d] no claim that it was unauthorized by law”
  • rejecting the contention that the matter was of such public importance as to confer standing
  • rejecting the notion that challenging an annexation was a matter of sufficient public importance to confer standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.