· 2/11/1991
Quinn v. City of Columbia
Citations
- 401 S.E.2d 165
- 303 S.C. 405
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 44
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the contention that the matter was of such public importance as to confer standing
- holding opponents to an annexation failed to establish standing in that they challenged only “the annexation method in seeking to have the annexation declared void and raise[d] no claim that it was unauthorized by law”
- rejecting the contention that the matter was of such public importance as to confer standing
- rejecting the notion that challenging an annexation was a matter of sufficient public importance to confer standing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.