Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “determination of public convenience and necessity” by the Public Service Commission was an issue of fact, which warranted “substantial judicial deference to the fact-finding processes of the administrative agency”
• holding that even when there is “a conflict of evidence before the commission” and the evidence was such that the commission could have reasonably reached a contrary decision, the commission's decision was not arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).