Quincy & Palmyra Railroad v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In interpreting a contract, we construe a contract that is clear on its face from the written language, and it should be enforced as written.”
• also emphasizing that \the decision to entertain\ a petition for mandamus challenging an order compelling arbitration is not automatic, but a matter \addressed solely to our discretion\
• also emphasizing that \the decision to entertain\ a petition for mandamus challenging an order compelling arbitration is not automatic, but a matter \addressed solely to our discretion\
• also emphasizing that \the decision to entertain\ a petition for mandamus challenging an order compelling arbitration is not automatic, but a matter \addressed solely to our discretion\
• also emphasizing that \the decision to entertain\ a petition for mandamus challenging an order compelling arbitration is not automatic, but a matter \addressed solely to our discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).