Quin v. Astor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 632 “contains no exceptions applicable when a business monitors a telephone conversa tion even if the monitoring is for a legitimate business purpose”
• holding a company may violate section 632 where supervisors listen in on phone calls between employees and customers without announcing their presence
• \The statute [ ] contains no exceptions applicable when a business monitors a telephone conversation even if the monitoring is for a legitimate business purpose.\
• “[Defendant’s] recorded call-monitoring disclosure stated: ‘This call may be monitored or recorded for quality control purposes,’ which would not necessarily inform a borrower that that this call and all future calls with [Defendant] may be monitored or recorded.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).