Quilty v. United Fruit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the seizure of a motorist in violation of R.C. 2935.03 is not per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment
• holding that an officer’s violation of Ohio’s jurisdictional law did “not rise to the level of a constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).